Skip to main content

​
4. The Ethics Cycle

Every principle of conduct at IBBE is upheld through a four-stage process designed to protect dignity while restoring discipline. Ethics here is not reactive policing — it is preventive architecture. The goal is not to punish mistakes but to preserve standards, ensuring the organization never drifts from its moral axis.

​
Stage 1: Observation

Every potential violation begins with observation — a calm, factual record of behavior that appears inconsistent with IBBE’s values or operational expectations. Observation is not accusation; it is documentation.
  • Any officer, coordinator, or leader may file an observation through the internal reporting channel.
  • Observations must include time, date, context, and evidence (message, file, or report).
  • Anonymous submissions are accepted only if supported by verifiable data.
  • Speculation, gossip, or emotional framing invalidate the entry.
Once logged, the observation is time-stamped and forwarded to the Ethics & Compliance Unit (ECU) for preliminary review.

​
Stage 2: Dialogue

The ECU initiates a private, structured dialogue with the concerned individual. This stage aims for clarity, not confrontation.
  • Both sides present verified facts within a 48-hour window.
  • Tone remains factual and non-performative; emotional arguments or appeals to hierarchy are not considered.
  • If the issue arises from misunderstanding, improper communication, or minor deviation, verbal correction and notation close the case.
  • If deeper intent or repetition is found, the case advances to correction.
Dialogue is where most issues are resolved — through honesty, accountability, and humility. The capacity to admit error calmly is treated as a sign of maturity, not weakness.

​
Stage 3: Correction

When a deviation has caused tangible disruption, the ECU issues a formal correction directive. This is not punishment; it is structured accountability.
  • The individual receives a written statement outlining the deviation, expected correction, and review period (usually 7–14 days).
  • During this period, the member continues duties under observation and is required to submit a Corrective Reflection Note — summarizing what was learned, what changes will be made, and how trust will be restored.
  • A senior member may be appointed as a mentor for the correction phase, ensuring support without bias.
  • Repeated disregard for correction or defensive conduct escalates the case to disciplinary review.
Correction is measured by change, not apology. The standard is met when behavior aligns with culture, not when regret is expressed.

​
Stage 4: Restoration

Once correction has been achieved, the process moves toward restoration — the formal reinstatement of full trust.
  • The ECU reviews evidence of improvement, including peer feedback and task performance.
  • If alignment is consistent, the member is officially reinstated and the case is marked “Restored.”
  • The reinstatement note remains confidential and internal; no public mention or announcement is permitted.
  • If the breach was serious but forgiven, future leadership eligibility may still require a probationary interval.
Restoration is the end of the process — a quiet return to standard. Humiliation, gossip, or public correction are prohibited under any circumstance. Dignity is non-negotiable, even in discipline.

​
Confidential Recordkeeping

Every ethical case — from observation to restoration — is archived within the Compliance Vault, the secure internal database governed jointly by the Ethics & Compliance Unit (ECU) and the President’s Office.
  • Each case is assigned a code (e.g., ECU-2025-04-B12) for internal tracking.
  • Access is limited to the ECU, the President, and the Vice President (People & Culture).
  • Quarterly audits review anonymized patterns to identify recurring issues and improve training, not to shame individuals.
Ethics at IBBE is a process of refinement — a mirror polished through accountability. Restoration, not humiliation, remains the only acceptable outcome.